From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzJ6L-0005ic-Su for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:17:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzJ6C-00005g-PM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:17:01 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]:61325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzJ6C-00005V-IC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:16:52 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k48so8040250wev.34 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <53A909C0.7080303@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:16:48 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201406240908546812611@sangfor.com> In-Reply-To: <201406240908546812611@sangfor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhang Haoyu , qemu-devel Cc: "Michael S.Tsirkin" Il 24/06/2014 03:08, Zhang Haoyu ha scritto: > Hi, all > > Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions? > Any advices? The QEMU probject is not providing long term stable branches. In fact, we lack the manpower to provide short term stable branches too. :( Paolo