From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzjnZ-0001hC-S5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:47:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzjnS-0003pV-AV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:47:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzjnS-0003pN-1r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:47:18 -0400 Message-ID: <53AA9AA1.2020106@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:47:13 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1402489176-19738-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <53A03615.7040701@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/13] "Light" memory region QOMification List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Il 25/06/2014 11:45, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto: > > Where we at with this? Is it possible to get this through in some form > inside 2.1 window and should I respin it? I think we are largely in > agreement on this series. I'm waiting for Andreas to review Stefan's object_property_add_alias series, because we agreed that it should go in first. Paolo