From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X05rA-0005DY-Dd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:20:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X05r1-000080-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:20:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]:51219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X05r0-00007Y-Us for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:20:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b13so3143181wgh.2 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 02:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <53ABE5CE.20608@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:20:14 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1403769303-15613-1-git-send-email-damarion@cisco.com> <20140626080155.GE21823@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost-user: fix VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Damjan Marion (damarion)" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com" Il 26/06/2014 11:10, Damjan Marion (damarion) ha scritto: > Does it really make a sense to keep old broken code, which doesn’t work if VM have more than 3 GB of RAM? > As Nikolay said yesterday: >> > On the other hand there's no wide adoption of >> > the protocol so it's still not critical to change it. > I think we should just fix it and keep it as version 1. > I agree. Anything that happens before 2.1 is final can stay as version 1. Paolo