From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X06i4-0000vy-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:15:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X06hw-0001Nm-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:15:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X06hw-0001Ne-EE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:15:08 -0400 Message-ID: <53ABF2A0.2050501@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:14:56 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1403709607-6434-1-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com> <53AAEE32.2000102@redhat.com> <53ABD731.6010604@greensocs.com> In-Reply-To: <53ABD731.6010604@greensocs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Frederic Konrad , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, quintela@redhat.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, vilanova@ac.upc.edu Il 26/06/2014 10:17, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: > > Hi, > > You mean adding cexe as a suboption of icount? > > Is both option related? > I mean reverse execution needs icount but I think it doesn't make sense > to make it as icount suboption? I think it does. The implementation relies heavily on icount. (Also please s/cexe/revexec/ :)). Paolo