From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, alex.williamson@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 1/3] sPAPR: Implement EEH RTAS calls
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:46:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ABFA1A.10105@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140626104338.GA4806@shangw>
On 26.06.14 12:43, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 26.06.14 03:35, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> The emulation for EEH RTAS requests from guest isn't covered
>>> by QEMU yet and the patch implements them.
>>>
>>> The patch defines constants used by EEH RTAS calls and adds
>>> callback sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler, which is going to be used
>>> this way:
>>>
>>> 1. RTAS calls are received in spapr_pci.c, sanity check is done
>>> there.
>>> 2. RTAS handlers handle what they can. If there is something it
>>> cannot handle and sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler callback is defined,
>>> it is called.
>>> 3. sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler is only implemented for VFIO now. It
>>> does ioctl() to the IOMMU container fd to complete the call. Error
>>> codes from that ioctl() are transferred back to the guest.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h | 7 ++
>>> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 33 ++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 280 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>> index 131434b..8712051 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>> @@ -422,6 +422,233 @@ static void rtas_ibm_query_interrupt_source_number(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> rtas_st(rets, 2, 1);/* 0 == level; 1 == edge */
>>> }
>>> +static int rtas_handle_eeh_request(sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>> + uint64_t buid, uint32_t req, uint32_t opt)
>>> +{
>>> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb = spapr_find_phb(spapr, buid);
>>> + sPAPRPHBClass *info = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>>> +
>>> + if (!sphb || !info->eeh_handler) {
>>> + return -ENOENT;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return info->eeh_handler(sphb, req, opt);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtas_ibm_set_eeh_option(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>>> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>>> + target_ulong rets)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t addr, option;
>>> + uint64_t buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if ((nargs != 4) || (nret != 1)) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + addr = rtas_ld(args, 0);
>>> + option = rtas_ld(args, 3);
>>> + switch (option) {
>>> + case RTAS_EEH_ENABLE:
>>> + if (!find_dev(spapr, buid, addr)) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + case RTAS_EEH_DISABLE:
>>> + case RTAS_EEH_THAW_IO:
>>> + case RTAS_EEH_THAW_DMA:
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = rtas_handle_eeh_request(spapr, buid,
>>> + RTAS_EEH_REQ_SET_OPTION, option);
>>> + if (ret >= 0) {
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +param_error_exit:
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtas_ibm_get_config_addr_info2(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>>> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>>> + target_ulong rets)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t addr, option;
>>> + uint64_t buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>>> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb = spapr_find_phb(spapr, buid);
>>> + sPAPRPHBClass *info = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>>> + PCIDevice *pdev;
>>> +
>>> + if (!sphb || !info->eeh_handler) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if ((nargs != 4) || (nret != 2)) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + addr = rtas_ld(args, 0);
>>> + option = rtas_ld(args, 3);
>>> + if (option != RTAS_GET_PE_ADDR && option != RTAS_GET_PE_MODE) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + pdev = find_dev(spapr, buid, addr);
>>> + if (!pdev) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * For now, we always have bus level PE whose address
>>> + * has format "00BBSS00". The guest OS might regard
>>> + * PE address 0 as invalid. We avoid that simply by
>>> + * extending it with one.
>>> + */
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>>> + if (option == RTAS_GET_PE_ADDR) {
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 1, (pci_bus_num(pdev->bus) << 16) + 1);
>>> + } else {
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 1, RTAS_PE_MODE_SHARED);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> +param_error_exit:
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtas_ibm_read_slot_reset_state2(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>>> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>>> + target_ulong rets)
>>> +{
>>> + uint64_t buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if ((nargs != 3) || (nret != 4 && nret != 5)) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = rtas_handle_eeh_request(spapr, buid, RTAS_EEH_REQ_GET_STATE, 0);
>>> + if (ret >= 0) {
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 1, ret);
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 2, RTAS_EEH_SUPPORT);
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 3, RTAS_EEH_PE_UNAVAIL_INFO);
>>> + if (nret >= 5) {
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 4, RTAS_EEH_PE_RECOVER_INFO);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +param_error_exit:
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtas_ibm_set_slot_reset(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>>> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>>> + target_ulong rets)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t option;
>>> + uint64_t buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if ((nargs != 4) || (nret != 1)) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + option = rtas_ld(args, 3);
>>> + switch (option) {
>>> + case RTAS_SLOT_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
>>> + case RTAS_SLOT_RESET_HOT:
>>> + case RTAS_SLOT_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL:
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = rtas_handle_eeh_request(spapr, buid, RTAS_EEH_REQ_RESET, option);
>>> + if (ret >= 0) {
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +param_error_exit:
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtas_ibm_configure_pe(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>>> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>>> + target_ulong rets)
>>> +{
>>> + uint64_t buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if ((nargs != 3) || (nret != 1)) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = rtas_handle_eeh_request(spapr, buid, RTAS_EEH_REQ_CONFIGURE, 0);
>>> + if (ret >= 0) {
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +param_error_exit:
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* To support it later */
>>> +static void rtas_ibm_slot_error_detail(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>>> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>>> + target_ulong rets)
>>> +{
>>> + int option;
>>> + uint64_t buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>>> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb = spapr_find_phb(spapr, buid);
>>> + sPAPRPHBClass *info = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>>> +
>>> + if (!sphb || !info->eeh_handler) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if ((nargs != 8) || (nret != 1)) {
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + option = rtas_ld(args, 7);
>>> + switch (option) {
>>> + case RTAS_SLOT_TEMP_ERR_LOG:
>>> + case RTAS_SLOT_PERM_ERR_LOG:
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + goto param_error_exit;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>> We don't return an error log, so shouldn't this be
>> RTAS_OUT_NO_ERRORS_FOUND (or a new name you come up with that fits
>> better for 1)?
>>
> Well, RTAS_OUT_NO_ERRORS_FOUND is correct constant for the return value
> according to PAPR spec:
>
> 1: No Error Log Returned
>
> Apart from this, anything else I need change? :-)
I didn't spot anything :)
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-26 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-26 1:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 0/3] EEH Support for VFIO PCI Devices Gavin Shan
2014-06-26 1:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 1/3] sPAPR: Implement EEH RTAS calls Gavin Shan
2014-06-26 10:30 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-26 10:43 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-26 10:46 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2014-06-27 9:53 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-27 11:46 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-26 1:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 2/3] headers: Update kernel header Gavin Shan
2014-06-26 1:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 3/3] sPAPR: Implement sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ABFA1A.10105@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).