From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41520)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1X0AAq-0001If-6j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:57:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1X0AAi-0005pl-Oa
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:57:12 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4120)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1X0AAi-0005pc-HP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:57:04 -0400
Message-ID: <53AC26A7.7070100@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:56:55 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1403709607-6434-1-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
	<53AAEE32.2000102@redhat.com> <53ABD731.6010604@greensocs.com>
	<53ABF2A0.2050501@redhat.com> <53AC2636.3040408@greensocs.com>
In-Reply-To: <53AC2636.3040408@greensocs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution.
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Frederic Konrad <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, quintela@redhat.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, vilanova@ac.upc.edu

Il 26/06/2014 15:55, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
> On 26/06/2014 12:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 26/06/2014 10:17, Frederic Konrad ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You mean adding cexe as a suboption of icount?
>>>
>>> Is both option related?
>>> I mean reverse execution needs icount but I think it doesn't make sense
>>> to make it as icount suboption?
>>
>> I think it does.  The implementation relies heavily on icount. (Also
>> please s/cexe/revexec/ :)).
>>
>> Paolo
>
> Ok right for the name :),
>
> Can't this suboption be fixed in a future patch when icount QemuOpts
> patch will be merged?

You can pick up that patch yourself from the series.  I think it even 
has Reviewed-bys (or the changes to make are mostly trivial).

Paolo