From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BKz-00031t-LV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:11:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BKr-0001IK-PO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:11:45 -0400 Received: from greensocs.com ([178.33.234.66]:57547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BKr-0001Hs-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:11:37 -0400 Message-ID: <53AC3827.3020907@greensocs.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:11:35 +0200 From: Frederic Konrad MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1403709607-6434-1-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com> <53AAEE32.2000102@redhat.com> <53ABD731.6010604@greensocs.com> <53ABF2A0.2050501@redhat.com> <53AC2636.3040408@greensocs.com> <53AC26A7.7070100@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53AC26A7.7070100@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, quintela@redhat.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, camille.begue@openwide.fr, amit.shah@redhat.com, sebastian.tanase@openwide.fr, vilanova@ac.upc.edu On 26/06/2014 15:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 26/06/2014 15:55, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: >> On 26/06/2014 12:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Il 26/06/2014 10:17, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> You mean adding cexe as a suboption of icount? >>>> >>>> Is both option related? >>>> I mean reverse execution needs icount but I think it doesn't make=20 >>>> sense >>>> to make it as icount suboption? >>> >>> I think it does. The implementation relies heavily on icount. (Also >>> please s/cexe/revexec/ :)). >>> >>> Paolo >> >> Ok right for the name :), >> >> Can't this suboption be fixed in a future patch when icount QemuOpts >> patch will be merged? > > You can pick up that patch yourself from the series. I think it even=20 > has Reviewed-bys (or the changes to make are mostly trivial). > > Paolo > CC'ing Sebastian Tanase and Camille B=E9gu=E9, Are you talking of this patch on the list:=20 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg03039.html ? It seems to includes the "align" options too. Is that possible to split=20 it up? Thanks, Fred