qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [regression] dataplane: throughout -40% by commit 580b6b2aa2
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:43:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AC3F8E.20808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVNLdnHwogXV=iFyvHgDvSZxNt1XaafZfFJiCh11dzhExA@mail.gmail.com>

Il 26/06/2014 17:37, Ming Lei ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Il 26/06/2014 17:14, Ming Lei ha scritto:
>>
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> I found VM block I/O thoughput is decreased by more than 40%
>>> on my laptop, and looks much worsen in my server environment,
>>> and it is caused by your commit 580b6b2aa2:
>>>
>>>           dataplane: use the QEMU block layer for I/O
>>>
>>> I run fio with below config to test random read:
>>>
>>> [global]
>>> direct=1
>>> size=4G
>>> bsrange=4k-4k
>>> timeout=20
>>> numjobs=4
>>> ioengine=libaio
>>> iodepth=64
>>> filename=/dev/vdc
>>> group_reporting=1
>>>
>>> [f]
>>> rw=randread
>>>
>>> Together with throughput drop, the latency is improved a little.
>>>
>>> With this commit, I/O block submitted to fs becomes much smaller
>>> than before, and more io_submit() need to be called to kernel, that
>>> means iodepth may become much less.
>>>
>>> I am not surprised with the result since I did compare VM I/O
>>> performance between qemu and lkvm before, which has no big qemu
>>> lock problem and handle I/O in a dedicated thread, but lkvm's block
>>> IO is still much worse than qemu from view of throughput, because
>>> lkvm doesn't submit block I/O at batch like the way of previous
>>> dataplane, IMO.
>>
>>
>> What is your elevator setting in both the host and the guest?  Usually
>> deadline gives the best performance.
>
> The test is based on cfq, but I just run a quick test with deadline, looks
> no obvious difference.

Can you give us your QEMU command line?

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-26 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-26 15:14 [Qemu-devel] [regression] dataplane: throughout -40% by commit 580b6b2aa2 Ming Lei
2014-06-26 15:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-26 15:37   ` Ming Lei
2014-06-26 15:43     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-06-26 15:47       ` Ming Lei
2014-06-26 15:57         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-27  1:15           ` Ming Lei
2014-06-27  4:59             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-27  6:23               ` Kevin Wolf
2014-06-27  7:35                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-27 12:35                 ` Ming Lei
2014-06-27  7:57               ` Ming Lei
2014-06-27 12:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-06-27 12:21   ` Kevin Wolf
2014-06-27 14:50     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-06-27 18:01   ` Ming Lei
2014-06-27 21:51     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-28  9:58       ` Ming Lei
2014-06-30  8:08         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-06-30  8:27           ` Ming Lei
2014-07-01 13:53           ` Ming Lei
2014-07-01 14:31             ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-01 14:49               ` Ming Lei
2014-07-01 16:49                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-02  0:48                   ` Ming Lei
2014-07-02  8:54                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-02  9:13                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-02  9:39                       ` Kevin Wolf
2014-07-02  9:48                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-02 10:01                           ` Kevin Wolf
2014-07-02 10:23                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-02 15:45                     ` Ming Lei
2014-07-02 16:13                       ` Ming Lei
2014-07-02 16:23                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-02 16:27                           ` Ming Lei
2014-07-02 16:38                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-02 16:41                               ` Ming Lei
2014-07-02 16:21                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-03  4:54                         ` Ming Lei
2014-07-03 10:29                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-03 11:50                             ` Ming Lei
2014-07-03 11:56                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-03 12:09                                 ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53AC3F8E.20808@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).