From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48609)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1X0HWf-0004Bh-HU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:48:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1X0HWa-0005Kp-Nz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:48:13 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36186)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1X0HWa-0005Jj-Fv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:48:08 -0400
Message-ID: <53AC9512.90708@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:48:02 +0200
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1403706959-6979-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
	<53AC8DE9.4030001@redhat.com> <53AC94CA.1010705@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <53AC94CA.1010705@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] bdrv_open() cleanups, part 1
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: benoit.canet@irqsave.net, armbru@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com

On 26.06.2014 23:46, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 03:17 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 25.06.2014 16:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> This is the first part of an attempt for disentangling bdrv_open(). At
>>> the end
>>> of this series, bdrv_open() code is somewhat easier to read, but the real
>>> changes (including some bug fixes and changes of behaviour) haven't
>>> happened
>>> yet.
>>>
>> With this series, iotests 040, 041 and 067 fail for me. I attached the
>> result.
> Actually, it wasn't this series, but the qapi-as-event series.  See here
> for more diagnosis and potential fixes:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg06554.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg06499.html

Ah, great, looking for the error here would have probably been rather 
interesting.

Max