From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0SqI-0007YO-37 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 05:53:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0SqA-0002cS-Kj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 05:53:14 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60723 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0SqA-0002aP-Do for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 05:53:06 -0400 Message-ID: <53AD3F00.6060400@suse.de> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:53:04 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v2 0/4] QOMify IRQs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini Am 25.06.2014 11:39, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite: > Ping! >=20 > This is fully reviewed and should be rdy for a merge. I'd like to see > this through for 2.1. I have been very wary of applying the QOM conversion without full device test coverage, similar to realization. People actually testing this conversion would've been more reaffirming than a bit of review - the hardfreeze can but does not necessarily uncover all corner cases. But time is running out, so I intend to apply the series unless I discover issues. qtests for missing devices or statistics of how incomplete our coverage actually is appreciated as always. Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg