From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws, xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ui/vnc: fix potential memory corruption issues
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:01:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B1195E.9060708@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404114779.24066.2.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>
On 30.06.2014 09:52, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mo, 2014-06-30 at 09:24 +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> this patch addresses 2 memory corruption issues.
>>
>> The first was actually discovered during playing
>> around with a Windows 7 vServer. During resolution
>> change in Windows 7 it happens sometimes that Windows
>> changes to an intermediate resolution where
>> server_stride % cmp_bytes != 0 (in vnc_refresh_server_surface).
>> This happens only if width % VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT != 0.
>> The patch fixes the issue by clamping cmp_bytes in that case
>> and it finally makes those resolutions work correctly.
>> This can be easily tested by setting VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT
>> to a bigger power of 2 value different than 16.
>>
>> The second is a theoretical issue, but is maybe exploitable
>> by the guest. If for some reason the surface size is bigger
>> than VNC_MAX_WIDTH x VNC_MAX_HEIGHT we end up in severe corruption.
>> This can be easily reproduced by playing around with VNC_MAX_WIDTH
>> and VNC_MAX_HEIGHT. This patch modifies the VNC server to only
>> track and copy the area up to the maximum possible size.
> So this basically makes vnc work correctly in case guest surface and
> server surface have different sizes, then fixes the two bugs on top of
> that. And it obsoletes the other corruption patch send Friday.
> Correct?
Yes and yes.
Basically the server surface is adjusted to not exceed VNC_MAX_WIDTH x VNC_MAX_HEIGHT
and on top the width is rounded up to multiple of VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT.
If you have a resolution whose width is not dividable by VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT you get
a small black bar on the right of the screen. First I wanted to fix only that and then
I noticed that VNC_MAX_WIDTH and VNC_MAX_HEIGHT are nowhere enforced. I do not
know if this is actually exploitable by the guest.
If the surface is too big to fit the limits only the upper left area is shown.
I ran several sessions with altered values of VNC_MAX_WIDTH, VNC_MAX_HEIGHT and VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT
in valgrind, but additional testing is welcome.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-30 7:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ui/vnc: fix potential memory corruption issues Peter Lieven
2014-06-30 7:52 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2014-06-30 8:01 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2014-06-30 8:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B1195E.9060708@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).