From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1cTy-0003Z1-Su for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:23:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1cTs-0006f0-RW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:22:58 -0400 Received: from mail-bl2lp0211.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.211]:59023 helo=na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1cTs-0006eu-Mn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:22:52 -0400 Message-ID: <53B172AA.10708@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:22:34 +0300 From: Diana Craciun MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1403802973-20841-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <53AD1F5F.3040504@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Implement vCPU reset via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT for 32-bit CPUs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Patch Tracking , QEMU Developers , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" Hi, I tested the patch on a cubieboard2 and it is working fine. However I did see some weird stuff, but I do not think that it is related with this patch as it reproduces without the patch also. What I am seeing is that after a number of resets (pretty random, sometimes I can reproduce it after 20,30 resets, sometimes after 5,6, but in general pretty hard to reproduce) is that the guest gets stuck somewhere (it does not boot to prompt) and further resets are not working. I remember I saw this also in the past but I did not have the chance to look into it in more depth. Diana On 06/27/2014 03:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 June 2014 08:38, Diana Craciun wrote: >> On 06/26/2014 08:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Testing appreciated: my ARMv7 box is being a bit flaky at the >>> moment; I don't *think* the occasional weird stuff I see is >>> the effect of this patch but it's hard to be certain. >> >> I will test your patch in the following days. > Thanks. If you can manage to test by Monday I can fit > this in before we roll 2.1 rc0 on Tuesday; otherwise > it'll have to slip to rc1. > > -- PMM