From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X21Sf-0003EX-M9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:03:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X21Sa-0000Vr-17 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:03:17 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]:39400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X21SZ-0000VZ-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:03:11 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r10so10418948pdi.4 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <53B2E9CA.4040802@twiddle.net> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:03:06 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140624043423.GX18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20140624165244.GY18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53A9C47C.2050002@twiddle.net> <20140624203244.GZ18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53A9E650.2020709@twiddle.net> <20140624212450.GB18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53A9EE7E.4020802@twiddle.net> <20140625070117.GD18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20140626055541.GF18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53B1AEEF.8010108@twiddle.net> <20140630205635.GG18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140630205635.GG18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] alpha qemu arithmetic exceptions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Al Viro Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/30/2014 01:56 PM, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:43AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > >> Looks good. >> >> I've split it up into a couple of smaller patches, made some sylistic tweaks >> and pushed it to >> >> git://github.com/rth7680/qemu.git axp-next >> >> I'm starting to do some testing now, but a glance though would be helpful. >> Especially to see if I didn't make some silly mistake in the process. Hmm. I've just gotten through glibc testing and there are quite a few failures of the form Failure: nearbyint (4.5): Exception "Inexact" set in math/test-double.out. Any chance you can run the glibc math tests against real hardware and see if these pass? I have a feeling that qemu is now signaling inexact when the hardware doesn't for "/SU" (but not /SUI) instructions. r~