From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48212)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1X2Gmy-0001CK-A2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:25:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1X2Gms-000516-H1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:25:16 -0400
Received: from mail-qa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::234]:47093)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1X2Gms-000512-De
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:25:10 -0400
Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id w8so8516967qac.25
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 02:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53B3CFF1.4090209@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:25:05 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <201406240908546812611@sangfor.com>	<20140624054947.GA25614@redhat.com>	<201406241445428077130@sangfor.com>
	<20140702063250.GA4015@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140702063250.GA4015@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm
	stablebranch?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Il 02/07/2014 08:32, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:45:44PM +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
>>> > >> Hi, all
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
>>> > >> Any advices?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Zhang Haoyu
>> > >
>> > >Use one of the downstreams: Red Hat, Fedora, Debian all ship QEMU and
>> > >have active QEMU maintainers developing the distribution.
>> > >
> > How to get the latest qemu distribution shipped by RedHat?
>
> You can try
> http://www.redhat.com/contact/sales.html
> and/or
> https://engage.redhat.com/forms/virtualization-contact-us

Also:

https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=rpms/qemu-kvm.git

Paolo