* [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch?
@ 2014-06-24 1:08 Zhang Haoyu
2014-06-24 5:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-24 5:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Haoyu @ 2014-06-24 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Michael S.Tsirkin
Hi, all
Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
Any advices?
Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch?
2014-06-24 1:08 [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch? Zhang Haoyu
@ 2014-06-24 5:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-24 5:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-06-24 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Haoyu, qemu-devel; +Cc: Michael S.Tsirkin
Il 24/06/2014 03:08, Zhang Haoyu ha scritto:
> Hi, all
>
> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
> Any advices?
The QEMU probject is not providing long term stable branches. In fact,
we lack the manpower to provide short term stable branches too. :(
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch?
2014-06-24 1:08 [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch? Zhang Haoyu
2014-06-24 5:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2014-06-24 5:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-24 6:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stablebranch? Zhang Haoyu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2014-06-24 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Haoyu; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, qemu-devel
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:08:56AM +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
> Any advices?
>
> Thanks,
> Zhang Haoyu
Use one of the downstreams: Red Hat, Fedora, Debian all ship QEMU and
have active QEMU maintainers developing the distribution.
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stablebranch?
2014-06-24 5:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2014-06-24 6:45 ` Zhang Haoyu
2014-07-02 6:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Haoyu @ 2014-06-24 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, qemu-devel
>> Hi, all
>>
>> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
>> Any advices?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zhang Haoyu
>
>Use one of the downstreams: Red Hat, Fedora, Debian all ship QEMU and
>have active QEMU maintainers developing the distribution.
>
How to get the latest qemu distribution shipped by RedHat?
Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu
>--
>MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stablebranch?
2014-06-24 6:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stablebranch? Zhang Haoyu
@ 2014-07-02 6:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-02 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2014-07-02 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Haoyu; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, qemu-devel
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:45:44PM +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
> >> Hi, all
> >>
> >> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
> >> Any advices?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Zhang Haoyu
> >
> >Use one of the downstreams: Red Hat, Fedora, Debian all ship QEMU and
> >have active QEMU maintainers developing the distribution.
> >
> How to get the latest qemu distribution shipped by RedHat?
>
> Thanks,
> Zhang Haoyu
You can try
http://www.redhat.com/contact/sales.html
and/or
https://engage.redhat.com/forms/virtualization-contact-us
> >--
> >MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stablebranch?
2014-07-02 6:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2014-07-02 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-07-02 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin, Zhang Haoyu; +Cc: qemu-devel
Il 02/07/2014 08:32, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:45:44PM +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
>>> > >> Hi, all
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
>>> > >> Any advices?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Zhang Haoyu
>> > >
>> > >Use one of the downstreams: Red Hat, Fedora, Debian all ship QEMU and
>> > >have active QEMU maintainers developing the distribution.
>> > >
> > How to get the latest qemu distribution shipped by RedHat?
>
> You can try
> http://www.redhat.com/contact/sales.html
> and/or
> https://engage.redhat.com/forms/virtualization-contact-us
Also:
https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=rpms/qemu-kvm.git
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-02 9:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-24 1:08 [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stable branch? Zhang Haoyu
2014-06-24 5:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-24 5:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-24 6:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm stablebranch? Zhang Haoyu
2014-07-02 6:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-02 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).