From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1? 2/2] thread-pool: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:36:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C39685.2090400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405077612-7806-3-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
Il 11/07/2014 13:20, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> The thread pool has a race condition if two elements complete before
> thread_pool_completion_bh() runs:
>
> If element A's callback waits for element B using aio_poll() it will
> deadlock since pool->completion_bh is not marked scheduled when the
> nested aio_poll() runs.
>
> Fix this by marking the BH scheduled while thread_pool_completion_bh()
> is executing. This way any nested aio_poll() loops will enter
> thread_pool_completion_bh() and complete the remaining elements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> thread-pool.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/thread-pool.c b/thread-pool.c
> index 4cfd078..0ede168 100644
> --- a/thread-pool.c
> +++ b/thread-pool.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ struct ThreadPool {
> int max_threads;
> QEMUBH *new_thread_bh;
>
> + /* Atomic counter to detect completions while completion handler runs */
> + uint32_t completion_token;
> +
> /* The following variables are only accessed from one AioContext. */
> QLIST_HEAD(, ThreadPoolElement) head;
>
> @@ -118,6 +121,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *opaque)
> qemu_cond_broadcast(&pool->check_cancel);
> }
>
> + atomic_inc(&pool->completion_token);
> qemu_bh_schedule(pool->completion_bh);
> }
>
> @@ -167,9 +171,8 @@ static void spawn_thread(ThreadPool *pool)
> }
> }
>
> -static void thread_pool_completion_bh(void *opaque)
> +static void thread_pool_complete_elements(ThreadPool *pool)
> {
> - ThreadPool *pool = opaque;
> ThreadPoolElement *elem, *next;
>
> restart:
> @@ -196,6 +199,26 @@ restart:
> }
> }
>
> +static void thread_pool_completion_bh(void *opaque)
> +{
> + ThreadPool *pool = opaque;
> + uint32_t token;
> +
> + do {
> + token = atomic_mb_read(&pool->completion_token);
> +
> + /* Stay scheduled in case elem->common.cb() makes a nested aio_poll()
> + * call. This avoids deadlock if element A's callback waits for
> + * element B and both completed at the same time.
> + */
> + qemu_bh_schedule(pool->completion_bh);
> +
> + thread_pool_complete_elements(pool);
> +
> + qemu_bh_cancel(pool->completion_bh);
> + } while (token != pool->completion_token);
> +}
> +
> static void thread_pool_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *acb)
> {
> ThreadPoolElement *elem = (ThreadPoolElement *)acb;
>
I am not sure I understand this patch.
The simplest way to fix deadlock is to change this in
thread_pool_completion_bh:
elem->common.cb(elem->common.opaque, elem->ret);
qemu_aio_release(elem);
goto restart;
to
/* In case elem->common.cb() makes a nested aio_poll() call,
* next may become invalid as well. Instead of just
* restarting the QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE, go through the BH
* once more, which also avoids deadlock if element A's
* callback waits for element B and both completed at the
* same time.
*/
qemu_bh_schedule(pool->completion_bh);
elem->common.cb(elem->common.opaque, elem->ret);
qemu_aio_release(elem);
There is no change in logic, it's just that the goto is switched to a BH
representing a continuation. I am then not sure why
pool->completion_token is necessary?
Perhaps it is just an optimization to avoid going multiple times around
aio_poll()?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-14 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 11:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1? 0/2] thread-pool: avoid fd usage and fix nested aio_poll() deadlock Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-11 11:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1? 1/2] thread-pool: avoid per-thread-pool EventNotifier Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-11 11:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1? 2/2] thread-pool: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-14 8:36 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-07-14 10:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-15 14:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-15 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-17 12:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-15 14:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-07-11 11:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1? 0/2] thread-pool: avoid fd usage and fix nested aio_poll() deadlock Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C39685.2090400@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).