From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X79xd-0004Jn-QZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:08:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X79xZ-0006S7-0J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:08:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X79xY-0006S1-OS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:08:24 -0400 Message-ID: <53C59841.20801@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:08:17 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1400253321-9239-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <538CDF30.9050902@beyond.pl> <20140603051630.GA2289@amt.cnet> <538DADED.4040609@redhat.com> <20140603163448.GA11829@amt.cnet> <53C584D3.8090109@redhat.com> <53C588F4.4040307@beyond.pl> <53C58BD2.602@redhat.com> <20140715203122.GB6258@amt.cnet> <20140715203435.GA15621@amt.cnet> <53C5928D.6030109@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH uq/master] kvmclock: Ensure proper env->tsc value for kvmclock_current_nsec calculation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrey Korolyov Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , =?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2luIEdpYnXFgmE=?= , Alexander Graf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Il 15/07/2014 23:05, Andrey Korolyov ha scritto: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 15/07/2014 22:34, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto: >> >>> The backtrace in the following message is for a different problem, >>> correct? >>> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg246161.html >> >> Correct. >> >> Paolo > > Sorry for being unclear. VM is running well, the resulting lockup > visibly affects only disk, I wrote this as a lockup, but it is not > complete lockup, I am able to execute cached executables (and see, for > example, soft lockup warnings for the disk). Yeah, that was my understanding. Can you reproduce it without rbd? Paolo