From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7P8h-0004ba-Vn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:21:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7P8a-0006Gm-GD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:20:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7P8a-0006Gb-0F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:20:48 -0400 Message-ID: <53C67C00.5000203@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:20:00 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1405513086-31246-1-git-send-email-sebastian.tanase@openwide.fr> In-Reply-To: <1405513086-31246-1-git-send-email-sebastian.tanase@openwide.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V4 0/6] icount: Implement delay algorithm between guest and host clocks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sebastian Tanase , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, aliguori@amazon.com, wenchaoqemu@gmail.com, quintela@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, michael@walle.cc, camille.begue@openwide.fr, alex@alex.org.uk, crobinso@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net Il 16/07/2014 14:18, Sebastian Tanase ha scritto: > v3 -> v4 > > * Add better error handling for 'strtol' in patch 2 > * Add 'Sleep' instead of 'nanosleep' for Windows hosts in patch 4 > * Remove function pointers from patches 4 and 5 Hi Sebastian, I think we're getting really close. I asked a question about clocks_offset; I think it's not necessary to compute it in cpu-exec.c because the same information is available elsewhere. It is also probably not necessary to make it public. Can you please check this? Once this is sorted out, the patch should be ready for inclusion in 2.2. Thanks for your effort! Paolo