From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X8EWE-00073V-HR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:12:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X8EW9-0006P0-2a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:12:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]:57382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X8EW8-0006Nm-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:12:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so3978478wgh.29 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <53C97FAB.9020500@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:12:27 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140717192204.GL2424@work-vm> <20140718171409.GD10517@work-vm> In-Reply-To: <20140718171409.GD10517@work-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] status for rc3/release List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Peter Maydell Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, QEMU Developers , quintela@redhat.com Il 18/07/2014 19:14, Dr. David Alan Gilbert ha scritto: > * Dr. David Alan Gilbert (dgilbert@redhat.com) wrote: >> * Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote: >>> So we just released rc2. The proposed schedule has >>> rc3 next Tuesday, with final release the Tuesday after. >>> >>> My thought is that we should aim for rc3 to add only >>> a fairly small number of focussed and "safe" bugfixes, >>> with the intention of making the final release be the >>> same as rc3 if no showstopper bugs are discovered. >>> If there are any showstoppers in rc3 we have a week >>> to fix them and roll and test an rc4. >>> >>> Does it seem to other people like we're on track for that? >>> I don't do the level of testing that I think Anthony had >>> access to, so I'm reliant on those of you doing testing >>> of the rc tarballs to report problems... >> >> There's something going on with migration; although we're >> passing virt-test and my tests with google stress app test, >> the thread on virtio-blk failures is one bad thing, and I've >> got another failure case (possibly ide cdrom but not obvious) >> that seems to be new somewhere between 2.0 and 2.1-rc0. > > Mine I seem to have bisected down to fe680d0dac85e0f2d6c3b53838c250f6e0b1f49b > 'exec: Limit translation limiting in address_space_translate to xen' > > I'm told this doesn't necessarily make sense, but: > works 62622c11f230edddcc47aabe2d988555bf125993 > broken fe680d0dac85e0f2d6c3b53838c250f6e0b1f49b > > (confirmed by running each twice) > and : > b18a990c - good > cab00a5aa - good > > This is squashfs on a livecd falling apart after migration. Can you give precise reproduction instructions before leaving? Which OS is being installed? Paolo