From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] virtio-rng: Add human-readable error message for negative max-bytes parameter
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:44:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CD355A.1000804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761irkv8y.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On 07/21/2014 03:48 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> It certainly could check whether the value fits into uint64_t.
>
> A quick peek at how string-input-visitor.c uses strtoll() makes me
> cringe.
>
> [...]
What I meant by that was to say that by the time a value was returned to
visit_type_uint64, the value has already been possibly converted
implicitly from a negative value, and we can't tell at this level if
that happened without re-inspecting the string we were passed. At that
point, why not just fix the string parsing mechanics one more layer down
in parse_type_int() -- or by creating another routine primitive; i.e
parse_type_uint.
As Eric Blake noted elsewhere in the thread, it would be nice to have
the ability to have three behaviors at the lowest level -- signed,
unsigned with wraparound, and unsigned strict. The biggest question in
my mind is how to add the property flag to allow authors to opt-in to
the unsigned with wraparound option, where the unsigned strict option
makes the most sense to me as a default.
For now I will just fix the error message. We can draft ideas for how to
fix the semantic issues in parsing later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 20:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] virtio-rng: Add human-readable error message for negative max-bytes parameter John Snow
2014-07-18 6:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 7:46 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-18 11:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 11:27 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-18 11:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 12:14 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-18 13:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 16:22 ` John Snow
2014-07-21 7:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 21:14 ` John Snow
2014-07-18 21:53 ` Eric Blake
2014-07-21 7:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-21 15:44 ` John Snow [this message]
2014-07-21 17:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-21 17:53 ` John Snow
2014-07-21 19:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-21 20:13 ` John Snow
2014-07-21 20:31 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CD355A.1000804@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).