From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9bty-0000QR-H7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:22:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9btr-0002fJ-2O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:22:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9btq-0002f8-QH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:22:42 -0400 Message-ID: <53CE81AA.2040609@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:22:18 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1738104785.20049265.1406042277758.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> In-Reply-To: <1738104785.20049265.1406042277758.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V4 0/6] icount: Implement delay algorithm between guest and host clocks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sebastian Tanase Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter maydell , aliguori@amazon.com, wenchaoqemu@gmail.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, michael@walle.cc, camille begue , alex@alex.org.uk, crobinso@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net Il 22/07/2014 17:17, Sebastian Tanase ha scritto: >> > That's a bug to fix indeed, then---it should count up from 0 without >> > icount, and icount shouldn't affect this. Thanks for investigating >> > it. > Just to be sure I don't missunderstand, when you say "without icount" > you refer to qemu_icount_bias (aka when the vcpu is inactive), right? No, I mean without "-icount", i.e. when QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL is just nanoseconds. Paolo