From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41478)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1XAJWQ-00016h-NX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:57:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1XAJWJ-00045C-Sy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:57:26 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59424 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1XAJWJ-00044j-Ls
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:57:19 -0400
Message-ID: <53D110BE.7050104@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:57:18 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1406190486-16026-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<1406190486-16026-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<53D0FC78.7080109@suse.de> <53D10E16.7060105@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <53D10E16.7060105@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.1 1/2] fix full frame updates for VNC
 clients
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>

Am 24.07.2014 15:45, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
> On 24.07.2014 14:30, Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
>> Am 24.07.2014 10:28, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
>>> From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de>
>>>
>>> If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its co=
ntent
>>> so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full frame, so setting fo=
rce_update
>>>
>>
>> Can you please sign off your (trivial) patch via reply?
>=20
> You mean confirming it was my patch? Yes, it was.

Yes, in the sense of written-by-you - that's expected to be indicated
the kernel way through a "Signed-off-by: Your name <your@email>" line,
usually automated via git commit -s.

Cheers,
Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg