From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAKQq-0004OP-L8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:55:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAKQk-0006me-Gx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:55:44 -0400 Message-ID: <53D11E47.6090605@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:55:03 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1406191971-22404-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <53D10DCF.5030807@redhat.com> <53D11009.4040704@suse.de> <53D11406.1020008@redhat.com> <53D11485.7050403@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <53D11485.7050403@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2.1] PPC: KVM: Fix g3beige and mac99 when HV is loaded List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 24/07/2014 16:13, Alexander Graf ha scritto: > > On 24.07.14 16:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 24/07/2014 15:54, Alexander Graf ha scritto: >>>> Why should anything except pseries ever use HV KVM? >>> Because there are no other Book3S machines :). And for BookE we don't >>> implement kvm_type != 0 because we only support either PR or HV >>> depending on the host platform. >> Yeah, what I meant was (in a rather Socratic way): why should the >> default for kvm_type == NULL be anything but PR? > > I would prefer to keep the BookE machines on kvm_type = 0. Saying "give > me whatever you can" makes a lot more sense there. Got the answer on IRC: (16:18:18) bonzini: agraf: do g3beige and mac99 run on booke PR kvm? (16:33:51) agraf: bonzini: nope - booke only virtualizes booke Paolo