From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XC26G-00013J-K6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:45:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XC267-0005EN-IL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:45:32 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]:60354)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XC267-0005EB-BC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:45:23 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x48so8471266wes.3
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53D7510C.9020808@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:45:16 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1406560119-22362-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<1406560119-22362-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20140729062856.GA16854@T430.nay.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140729062856.GA16854@T430.nay.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] scsi-block: extract
	scsi_block_is_passthrough
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 29/07/2014 08:28, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
>> > +
>> > +    default:
>> > +        break;
> Out of curiosity, why add this default branch?

No particular reason, I guess I've changed my style since I wrote this code!

Paolo