From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC3w6-000801-BW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 05:43:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC3vy-0005ur-Th for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 05:43:10 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]:45468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC3vy-0005uF-M3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 05:43:02 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t60so8446868wes.6 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D76C81.5080602@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:42:25 +0200 From: Eric Auger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <53D675D3.6080508@linaro.org> <87wqawwum0.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <53D75199.1060308@linaro.org> <87lhrco7nq.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87lhrco7nq.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Dynamic QEMU platform device instantiation in machine files: phone call on Wed July 30 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Peter Maydell , Stuart Yoder , Alvise Rigo , qemu list , Alexander Graf , Rob Herring On 07/29/2014 11:07 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Eric Auger writes: > >> Hi Markus, >> >> Thank you for the proposal. Actually quite a lot of people are now OK >> with this time slot. This phone call was organized in non std way since >> Alex was not available next week. If you don't mind I would now prefer >> to keep this slot. > > Let's keep it. > > Don't be shy using the ordinary call in the future, even if that means > asking for one outside the biweekly schedule. OK sure I will ;-) > >> Do you wish to join by the way? > > I'd love to, but family obligations will make it difficult. > > You said "17h-18h CET". Do you mean CEST? Easiest way to avoid the > confusion is UTC. Yes CEST = UTC + 2. Thanks for pointing out the need for clarification. Regards Eric >