From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] hw:i386:pc_piix: split pc_init1()
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:19:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D8AAAE.1000705@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140729112600.GC13763@redhat.com>
On 2014/7/29 19:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 07:30:26PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>> We'd like to split pc_init1 and then we can share something
>> with other stuff.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
>
> Did you test this patch? It does not look like it can work.
Just compile but I think you're right. Here something is really wrong
here, so this is my fault.
I will regenerate this patch and do test to double check.
Thanks
Tiejun
>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>> index 7081c08..2391fda 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>> @@ -70,34 +70,21 @@ static bool smbios_legacy_mode;
>> static bool gigabyte_align = true;
>> static bool has_reserved_memory = true;
>>
>> -/* PC hardware initialisation */
>> -static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>> +static ram_addr_t below_4g_mem_size;
>> +static ram_addr_t above_4g_mem_size;
>> +static void pc_machine_base_init(MachineState *machine,
>> int pci_enabled,
>> - int kvmclock_enabled)
>> + int kvmclock_enabled,
>> + DeviceState *icc_bridge,
>> + MemoryRegion *ram_memory,
>> + MemoryRegion *pci_memory,
>> + qemu_irq *gsi,
>> + GSIState *gsi_state,
>> + FWCfgState *fw_cfg)
>> {
>> PCMachineState *pc_machine = PC_MACHINE(machine);
>> MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
>> - MemoryRegion *system_io = get_system_io();
>> - int i;
>> - ram_addr_t below_4g_mem_size, above_4g_mem_size;
>> - PCIBus *pci_bus;
>> - ISABus *isa_bus;
>> - PCII440FXState *i440fx_state;
>> - int piix3_devfn = -1;
>> - qemu_irq *cpu_irq;
>> - qemu_irq *gsi;
>> - qemu_irq *i8259;
>> - qemu_irq *smi_irq;
>> - GSIState *gsi_state;
>> - DriveInfo *hd[MAX_IDE_BUS * MAX_IDE_DEVS];
>> - BusState *idebus[MAX_IDE_BUS];
>> - ISADevice *rtc_state;
>> - ISADevice *floppy;
>> - MemoryRegion *ram_memory;
>> - MemoryRegion *pci_memory;
>> MemoryRegion *rom_memory;
>> - DeviceState *icc_bridge;
>> - FWCfgState *fw_cfg = NULL;
>> PcGuestInfo *guest_info;
>> ram_addr_t lowmem;
>>
>> @@ -190,6 +177,20 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>> } else {
>> gsi = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, gsi_state, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>> }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pc_machine_pci_bus_init(MachineState *machine,
>> + int pci_enabled,
>> + PCII440FXState *i440fx_state,
>> + int piix3_devfn,
>> + PCIBus *pci_bus,
>> + ISABus *isa_bus,
>> + qemu_irq *gsi,
>> + MemoryRegion *pci_memory,
>> + MemoryRegion *ram_memory)
>> +{
>> + MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
>> + MemoryRegion *system_io = get_system_io();
>>
>> if (pci_enabled) {
>> pci_bus = i440fx_init(&i440fx_state, &piix3_devfn, &isa_bus, gsi,
>> @@ -203,6 +204,28 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>> isa_bus = isa_bus_new(NULL, system_io);
>> no_hpet = 1;
>> }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pc_machine_device_init(MachineState *machine,
>> + int pci_enabled,
>> + GSIState *gsi_state,
>> + DeviceState *icc_bridge,
>> + int piix3_devfn,
>> + FWCfgState *fw_cfg,
>> + PCIBus *pci_bus,
>> + ISABus *isa_bus,
>> + qemu_irq *gsi)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + DriveInfo *hd[MAX_IDE_BUS * MAX_IDE_DEVS];
>> + BusState *idebus[MAX_IDE_BUS];
>> + qemu_irq *smi_irq;
>> + PCMachineState *pc_machine = PC_MACHINE(machine);
>> + qemu_irq *cpu_irq;
>> + qemu_irq *i8259;
>> + ISADevice *rtc_state;
>> + ISADevice *floppy;
>> +
>> isa_bus_irqs(isa_bus, gsi);
>>
>> if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
>> @@ -290,6 +313,30 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/* PC hardware initialisation */
>> +static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>> + int pci_enabled,
>> + int kvmclock_enabled)
>> +{
>> + PCIBus *pci_bus = NULL;
>> + ISABus *isa_bus = NULL;
>> + PCII440FXState *i440fx_state = NULL;
>> + int piix3_devfn = -1;
>> + qemu_irq *gsi = NULL;
>> + GSIState *gsi_state = NULL;
>> + MemoryRegion *ram_memory = NULL;
>> + MemoryRegion *pci_memory = NULL;
>> + DeviceState *icc_bridge = NULL;
>> + FWCfgState *fw_cfg = NULL;
>
> These are set to NULL here and never modified below.
> Why does it make sense?
>
>
>> +
>> + pc_machine_base_init(machine, pci_enabled, kvmclock_enabled, icc_bridge,
>> + ram_memory, pci_memory, gsi, gsi_state, fw_cfg);
>> + pc_machine_pci_bus_init(machine, pci_enabled, i440fx_state, piix3_devfn,
>> + pci_bus, isa_bus, gsi, pci_memory, ram_memory);
>> + pc_machine_device_init(machine, pci_enabled, gsi_state, icc_bridge,
>> + piix3_devfn, fw_cfg, pci_bus, isa_bus, gsi);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void pc_init_pci(MachineState *machine)
>> {
>> pc_init1(machine, 1, 1);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-30 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-24 11:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] xen:passthrough: introduce a separate machine to igd passthrough Tiejun Chen
2014-07-24 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] hw:i386:pc_piix: split pc_init1() Tiejun Chen
2014-07-29 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-30 8:19 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-07-30 17:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-24 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] xen:hw:pci-host:piix: create host bridge to passthrough Tiejun Chen
2014-07-29 11:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-30 8:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-07-30 17:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-24 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] xen:hw:pci-host:piix: introduce xen_igd_i440fx_init Tiejun Chen
2014-07-29 11:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-30 8:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-07-30 17:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-24 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen:hw:i386:pc_piix: introduce new machine for IGD passthrough Tiejun Chen
2014-07-29 11:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-30 8:31 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-07-30 17:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-29 5:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] xen:passthrough: introduce a separate machine to igd passthrough Chen, Tiejun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D8AAAE.1000705@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).