From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38515) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XCrBj-0007wr-GY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:18:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XCrBd-0000qw-Bl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:18:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XCrBd-0000qh-4O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:18:29 -0400 Message-ID: <53DA5028.6010406@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:18:16 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140717110153.8352.80175.stgit@PASHA-ISP> <53D14707.7080509@redhat.com> <2596.37912172384$1406533875@news.gmane.org> <53D62210.9060903@redhat.com> <000101cfabca$07016870$15043950$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <53D8B9F8.7090804@redhat.com> <53D8F0EE.1090706@greensocs.com> <53D8F491.3040202@redhat.com> <53D9065B.103@greensocs.com> <53DA3F02.4080607@greensocs.com> In-Reply-To: <53DA3F02.4080607@greensocs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/49] Series short description List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Frederic Konrad , Pavel Dovgaluk , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, real@ispras.ru, batuzovk@ispras.ru Il 31/07/2014 15:05, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: >>> >> >> I think that our first patch set part (icount fixes and icount based >> clock) is fully reviewed and can be upstreamed, >> but since the reverse execution mechanism itself is very similar >> between our series and Pavels, while Pavel=E2=80=99s >> set goes further in terms of addressing IO replay, I suggest Pavel >> uses our icount counter with his mechanism. >> >> In addition maybe this series can be split eg: >> the migration related series/the mechanism itself so it will be easier >> for me to review your mechanism? > > Is that making sense? Yes, definitely. If you rebase reverse execution on top of branch uq/master of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git I can include it in the same pull request as icount alignment (which is now ready for inclusion in 2.2). Paolo