From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XINw8-0000So-Bm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:17:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XINvx-0000Pr-Gb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:17:18 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]:54857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XINvx-0000Pm-AV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:17:09 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w61so2704409wes.23 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <53EE6ABA.2080307@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:16:58 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140805144728.GH4391@noname.str.redhat.com> <20140806084855.GA4090@noname.str.redhat.com> <20140810114624.0305b7af@tom-ThinkPad-T410> <53E91B5D.4090009@redhat.com> <53EA6635.9040600@redhat.com> <20140813095400.GA3701@noname.redhat.com> <53EB654B.2020200@redhat.com> <20140814093921.GD9874@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140814093921.GD9874@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 00/17] dataplane: optimization and multi virtqueue support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi , Ming Lei Cc: Kevin Wolf , Fam Zheng , qemu-devel Il 14/08/2014 11:39, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto: > That begs the question whether you should look at PCI passthrough > instead? Being able to use logical volumes, or to access multiple remote LUNs through a single FC card in the host is an obvious reason to avoid PCI passthrough. Paolo