Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface

[Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>]

On 08/20/2014 10:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20.08.14 13:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 08/20/2014 09:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20.08.14 12:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> On 07/17/2014 04:30 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>> On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>>> Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>> No, you should politely bother them again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That does not seem helping though :-/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can
>>>>>> ack it.  It looks good to me though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me clarify things here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to
>>>>> 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current upstream,
>>>>> repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is my current set:
>>>>> 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface
>>>>> 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface
>>>>> 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface
>>>>> 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass
>>>>> 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alex, ping.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Uh, what exactly do you expect from me? :)
>>
>> No idea :) You could take patches to your tree. I do not understand what to
>> do with this set now. Please help. Thanks.
> 
> The way I understood your last email you wanted to rebase and repost
> them at which point someone could pick them up :)

I wanted answer to "is that correct?" :)
And I tried replaying the patchset on top of your ppc-next, it applied. But
I'll repost to make sure that we have the same thing.



-- 
Alexey