From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32834)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <valentin.manea@gmail.com>) id 1XKten-0005Os-1k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:33:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <valentin.manea@gmail.com>) id 1XKtee-0006qa-2A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:33:48 -0400
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]:54015)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <valentin.manea@gmail.com>) id 1XKted-0006qU-PZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:33:39 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id gi9so7790856lab.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53F78CFF.2010404@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:33:35 +0300
From: Valentin Manea <valentin.manea@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <53F77740.5030200@mrs.ro>	<53F77793.1080609@mrs.ro>	<53F77828.2050908@mrs.ro>	<53F77855.1070506@gmail.com>
	<53F77893.4050609@gmail.com> <53F77FB1.9090800@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <53F77FB1.9090800@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] target-openrisc: Add LPC32XX
 touchscreen device
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: jia Liu <proljc@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 2014-08-22 20:36, Eric Blake wrote:
> [meta-comment]
> 
> We prefer shallow threading (git send-email's default, if you don't mess
> with configuration variables, where patch 4 is in-reply-to _only_ 0/4):
> 
> 0/4
> + 1/4
> + 2/4
> + 3/4
> + 4/4
> 
> which also leads to nicer review tree layouts:
> 
> 0/4
> + 1/4
> | + Re: 1/4
> + 2/4
> | + Re: 2/4
> + 3/4
> | + Re: 3/4
> + 4/4
>   + Re: 4/4
> 

Point taken, it makes more sense this way. Sorry, I haven't been doing this for a long time.

Valentin