From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMAo9-0006Un-AX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:04:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMAny-0002LY-4Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:04:45 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:48668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMAnx-0002LK-SK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:04:34 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:04:32 -0600 Message-ID: <53FC3176.8040109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:34:22 +0530 From: Aravinda Prasad MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140825134353.2361.52046.stgit@aravindap> <20140825134554.2361.45051.stgit@aravindap> <20140826060411.GS9923@voom.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140826060411.GS9923@voom.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] target-ppc: Handle cases when multi-processors get machine-check List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, benh@au1.ibm.com, aik@au1.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, paulus@samba.org On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:34 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 07:15:54PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote: >> It is possible for multi-processors to experience machine >> check at or about the same time. As per PAPR, subsequent >> processors serialize waiting for the first processor to >> issue the ibm,nmi-interlock call. >> >> The second processor retries if the first processor which >> received a machine check is still reading the error log >> and is yet to issue ibm,nmi-interlock call. >> >> This patch implements this functionality. > > The previous patch is broken without this, so just fold the two > together. sure. Thanks for the review. Regards, Aravinda > -- Regards, Aravinda