Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/12] spapr_events: event-scan RTAS interface

[Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>]

On 08/19/2014 10:21 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
> From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> We don't actually rely on this interface to surface hotplug events, and
> instead rely on the similar-but-interrupt-driven check-exception RTAS
> interface used for EPOW events. However, the existence of this interface
> is needed to ensure guest kernels initialize the event-reporting
> interfaces which will in turn be used by userspace tools to handle these
> events, so we implement this interface as a stub.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c         | 1 +
>  hw/ppc/spapr_events.c  | 9 +++++++++
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 825fd31..c65b13a 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ static void *spapr_create_fdt_skel(hwaddr initrd_base,
>          refpoints, sizeof(refpoints))));
>  
>      _FDT((fdt_property_cell(fdt, "rtas-error-log-max", RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX)));
> +    _FDT((fdt_property_cell(fdt, "rtas-event-scan-rate", RTAS_EVENT_SCAN_RATE)));
>  
>      /*
>       * According to PAPR, rtas ibm,os-term, does not gaurantee a return
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> index c0be0e5..bb80080 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> @@ -449,6 +449,14 @@ static void check_exception(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static void event_scan(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
> +                            uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
> +                            target_ulong args,
> +                            uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets)
> +{
> +    rtas_st(rets, 0, 1); /* no error events found */


rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);



> +}
> +
>  void spapr_events_init(sPAPREnvironment *spapr)
>  {
>      spapr->check_exception_irq = xics_alloc(spapr->icp, 0, 0, false);
> @@ -456,4 +464,5 @@ void spapr_events_init(sPAPREnvironment *spapr)
>      qemu_register_powerdown_notifier(&spapr->epow_notifier);
>      spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_CHECK_EXCEPTION, "check-exception",
>                          check_exception);
> +    spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_EVENT_SCAN, "event-scan", event_scan);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index 5382bf1..aab627f 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -484,6 +484,8 @@ int spapr_rtas_device_tree_setup(void *fdt, hwaddr rtas_addr,
>  
>  #define RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX      2048
>  
> +#define RTAS_EVENT_SCAN_RATE    1

1 second? 1ms? 1 minute? :) Worth mentioning in the commit log.


> +
>  typedef struct sPAPRTCETable sPAPRTCETable;
>  
>  #define TYPE_SPAPR_TCE_TABLE "spapr-tce-table"
> 


-- 
Alexey