From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMdR3-0000gP-Qm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:38:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMdQx-0007lK-Ev for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:38:49 -0400 Message-ID: <53FDDF4F.1050602@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:38:23 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1408969024-22548-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20140827133400.GK8280@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140827133400.GK8280@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: process -object after other backend options List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, akong@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org Il 27/08/2014 15:34, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto: > Option ordering is a bad idea. With an option as generic as -object, > who can say that there will never be a non-object that depends on an > -object? > > We should process the command-line left-to-right instead of ordering by > option type. Maybe that would be a good QEMU 3.0 feature! :) > > Feel free to merge if it works for now, but we'll need a better fix in > the future. I agree on all points. Paolo