From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMko6-0007mC-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:31:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMko1-0007HU-4r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:31:06 -0400 Message-ID: <53FE4E13.1060803@suse.de> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:30:59 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140827175556.GA24631@mail.hallyn.com> <20140827184557.GB24631@mail.hallyn.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/1] Support ppc64le binfmt registration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , QEMU Developers On 27.08.14 21:01, Peter Maydell wrote: > [adding qemu-ppc] > > On 27 August 2014 19:45, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org): >>> On 27 August 2014 18:55, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>>> This is a part of a patch proposed by jaejunh at >>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1358268 >>>> which enables running ppc64le binaries through qemu-user. >>> >>> I'm confused -- wouldn't these be handled by the existing >>> "ppc64le" support? > >> It looks to me like the point was to add a TARGET_ABI32=y >> version (and I dunno, something about CONFIG_LIBDECNUMBER=y >> for 32-bit). > > Wouldn't that be a "ppc64leabi32" target? There is no LE support for 32bit on PPC :). Alex