From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40757) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djuXF-0000fl-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:47:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djuXE-0000C1-7z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:47:01 -0400 References: <20170814215748.5158-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20170814215748.5158-9-ehabkost@redhat.com> <7327f3f6-16fb-e9c6-4f2a-eed6144f2282@redhat.com> <20170818165716.GB3108@localhost.localdomain> From: John Snow Message-ID: <53a1c9d4-e61e-6bd8-1b00-f1f45dd02ebd@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:46:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170818165716.GB3108@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v4 08/13] ide: enumerate_slots implementation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Laine Stump , Marcel Apfelbaum On 08/18/2017 12:57 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 05:46:18PM -0400, John Snow wrote: >> >> >> On 08/14/2017 05:57 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> Example output when using "-machine q35": >>> >>> { >>> "available": true, >>> "count": 1, >>> "device-types": [ >>> "ide-device" >>> ], >>> "hotpluggable": false, >>> "opts": [ >>> { "option": "unit", "values": 0 }, >>> { "option": "bus", "values": "ide.2" } >>> ], >>> "opts-complete": true >>> } >>> { >>> "available": false, >>> "count": 1, >>> "device": "/machine/unattached/device[19]", >>> "device-types": [ >>> "ide-device" >>> ], >>> "hotpluggable": false, >>> "opts": [ >>> { "option": "unit", "values": 1 }, >>> { "option": "bus", "values": "ide.2" } ], >>> "opts-complete": true >>> } >>> { >>> "available": true, >>> "count": 10, >>> "device-types": [ >>> "ide-device" >>> ], >>> "hotpluggable": false, >>> "opts": [ >>> { "option": "unit", "values": [ [ 0, 1 ] ] }, >> >> Hm, these unit values aren't really correct -- we do not support >> primary/secondary semantics for IDE buses on the AHCI device. I guess >> they technically exist, but you cannot use them for anything. >> >> Should I do something to "disable" or otherwise hide the unusable >> secondary unit slots for AHCI devices? > > If the device is already rejecting -device ...,unit=1, then the > bug is in my implementation of enumerate_devices. Maybe it > should just look at IDEBus::max_units to find that out? > jhuston@probe (master) ~/s/q/b/git> ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ -M q35 \ -nodefaults \ -device ich9-ahci,id=ahci0 \ -drive id=bar,file=/media/ext/img/f25.qcow2,if=none \ -device ide-hd,id=foo,bus=ahci0.0,drive=bar,unit=1 \ -vga std qemu-system-x86_64: -device ide-hd,id=foo,bus=ahci0.0,drive=bar,unit=1: Can't create IDE unit 1, bus supports only 1 units qemu-system-x86_64: -device ide-hd,id=foo,bus=ahci0.0,drive=bar,unit=1: Device initialization failed. based on; IDEBus.max_units as seen in: hw/ide/qdev.c line 93. Seems a bit like a hack on IDE's end -- but if your enumerate devices code has a call-in inside of the IDE layer, please do check the IDEBus::max_units property. --js