From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
nicolinc@nvidia.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
chao.p.peng@intel.com, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] vfio: Move realize() after attach_device()
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:33:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53bd9468-aa91-48b7-b186-9909d65973b3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411101707.3460429-3-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
On 4/11/25 12:17, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> Previously device attaching depends on realize() getting host iommu
> capabilities to check dirty tracking support.
>
> Now we save a caps copy in VFIODevice and check that copy for dirty
> tracking support, there is no dependency any more, move realize()
> call after attach_device() call in vfio_device_attach().
>
> Drop vfio_device_hiod_realize() which looks redundant now.
>
> Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> ---
> include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h | 1 -
> hw/vfio/container.c | 4 ----
> hw/vfio/device.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
> hw/vfio/iommufd.c | 4 ----
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h
> index 09a7af891a..14559733c6 100644
> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h
> @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ bool vfio_device_irq_set_signaling(VFIODevice *vbasedev, int index, int subindex
>
> void vfio_device_reset_handler(void *opaque);
> bool vfio_device_is_mdev(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
> -bool vfio_device_hiod_realize(VFIODevice *vbasedev, Error **errp);
> bool vfio_device_attach(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
> AddressSpace *as, Error **errp);
> void vfio_device_detach(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/container.c b/hw/vfio/container.c
> index 23a3373470..676e88cef4 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/container.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/container.c
> @@ -883,10 +883,6 @@ static bool vfio_legacy_attach_device(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>
> trace_vfio_device_attach(vbasedev->name, groupid);
>
> - if (!vfio_device_hiod_realize(vbasedev, errp)) {
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> group = vfio_group_get(groupid, as, errp);
> if (!group) {
> return false;
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/device.c b/hw/vfio/device.c
> index 4de6948cf4..6154d3f443 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/device.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/device.c
> @@ -347,17 +347,6 @@ bool vfio_device_is_mdev(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
> return subsys && (strcmp(subsys, "/sys/bus/mdev") == 0);
> }
>
> -bool vfio_device_hiod_realize(VFIODevice *vbasedev, Error **errp)
> -{
> - HostIOMMUDevice *hiod = vbasedev->hiod;
> -
> - if (!hiod) {
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - return HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(hiod)->realize(hiod, vbasedev, errp);
> -}
> -
> VFIODevice *vfio_get_vfio_device(Object *obj)
> {
> if (object_dynamic_cast(obj, TYPE_VFIO_PCI)) {
> @@ -372,6 +361,7 @@ bool vfio_device_attach(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
> {
> const VFIOIOMMUClass *ops =
> VFIO_IOMMU_CLASS(object_class_by_name(TYPE_VFIO_IOMMU_LEGACY));
> + HostIOMMUDeviceClass *hiodc;
> HostIOMMUDevice *hiod = NULL;
>
> if (vbasedev->iommufd) {
> @@ -380,16 +370,20 @@ bool vfio_device_attach(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>
> assert(ops);
>
> + if (!ops->attach_device(name, vbasedev, as, errp)) {
> + return false;
> + }
>
> if (!vbasedev->mdev) {
> hiod = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE(object_new(ops->hiod_typename));
> - vbasedev->hiod = hiod;
> - }
> + hiodc = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(hiod);
>
> - if (!ops->attach_device(name, vbasedev, as, errp)) {
> - object_unref(hiod);
> - vbasedev->hiod = NULL;
> - return false;
> + if (!hiodc->realize(hiod, vbasedev, errp)) {
> + object_unref(hiod);
> + ops->detach_device(vbasedev);
> + return false;
> + }
> + vbasedev->hiod = hiod;
This is not what I meant. I was not clear enough. Sorry about that.
hiodc->realize can be called under each container backend: legacy
and iommufd. I don't see much much value to make it common and
it would remove the unref/detach sequence to handle errors.
Thanks,
C.
> }
>
> return true;
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
> index 530cde6740..e05b472e35 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
> @@ -502,10 +502,6 @@ static bool iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,
> * FD to be connected and having a devid to be able to successfully call
> * iommufd_backend_get_device_info().
> */
> - if (!vfio_device_hiod_realize(vbasedev, errp)) {
> - goto err_alloc_ioas;
> - }
> -
> if (!iommufd_backend_get_device_info(vbasedev->iommufd, vbasedev->devid,
> &caps->type, &caps->vendor_caps,
> sizeof(VendorCaps), &caps->hw_caps,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-11 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 10:17 [PATCH 0/5] cleanup interfaces Zhenzhong Duan
2025-04-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] vfio/iommufd: Save host iommu capabilities in VFIODevice.caps Zhenzhong Duan
2025-04-11 10:49 ` Joao Martins
2025-04-14 9:11 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-04-11 11:28 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-14 9:30 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
[not found] ` <Z/7z2RZyqhy43S/O@Asurada-Nvidia>
2025-04-16 5:49 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
[not found] ` <Z//4pYO/Xs/7U+dW@Asurada-Nvidia>
2025-04-17 4:08 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-05-05 16:14 ` Eric Auger
2025-05-06 9:25 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-05-05 16:22 ` Eric Auger
2025-05-05 16:38 ` Eric Auger
2025-05-06 6:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-04-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] vfio: Move realize() after attach_device() Zhenzhong Duan
2025-04-11 10:54 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-04-14 9:12 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-04-11 11:33 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2025-04-14 9:37 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-04-18 20:56 ` Donald Dutile
2025-04-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] vfio/iommufd: Implement .get_cap() in TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD_VFIO sub-class Zhenzhong Duan
[not found] ` <Z/702atFa6kyCI/D@Asurada-Nvidia>
2025-04-16 5:54 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-04-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] backends/iommufd: Drop hiod_iommufd_get_cap() Zhenzhong Duan
2025-04-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] vfio/iommufd: Drop HostIOMMUDeviceCaps from HostIOMMUDevice Zhenzhong Duan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53bd9468-aa91-48b7-b186-9909d65973b3@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).