From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNdgS-0005gd-CE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 04:07:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNdgJ-00042U-BQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 04:06:52 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:52170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNdgJ-00041W-3D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 04:06:43 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 02:06:39 -0600 Message-ID: <54018609.3080403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:36:33 +0530 From: Aravinda Prasad MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140825134353.2361.52046.stgit@aravindap> <20140825134535.2361.37728.stgit@aravindap> <53FDA9EB.5010301@suse.de> <53FEC868.9060009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53FEEA0A.4060204@suse.de> <1409221308.25772.194.camel@pasglop> <53FF0483.3060806@suse.de> <1409221991.25772.198.camel@pasglop> <53FF642E.5070205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1409256443.17335.1.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1409256443.17335.1.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/5] target-ppc: Build error log List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: aik@au1.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , paulus@samba.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Friday 29 August 2014 01:37 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 22:47 +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote: >> Should we avoid having error log in 0x7000? As per above only >> ibm,nmi-register-2 places error log in 0x7000 which will be terminated >> in future? > > The question is which variant Linux uses and which variant are other > OSes we might be interested in use ? > > We might have to implement both, but I would probably start with just > ibm,nmi-register sure. > > Cheers, > Ben. > > -- Regards, Aravinda