From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, allen.m.kay@intel.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen:i386:pc_piix: create isa bridge specific to IGD passthrough
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:49:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54042514.6090206@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140901060506.GA20186@redhat.com>
On 2014/9/1 14:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 10:50:37AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>> On 2014/8/31 16:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:28:50AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2014/8/28 8:56, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>>>> + dev = pci_create_simple(bus, PCI_DEVFN(0x1f, 0),
>>>>>>>>>>> + "xen-igd-passthrough-isa-bridge");
>>>>>>>>>>> + if (dev) {
>>>>>>>>>>> + r = xen_host_pci_device_get(&hdev, 0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0x1f,
>>>>>>>>>>> 0), 0);
>>>>>>>>>>> + if (!r) {
>>>>>>>>>>> + pci_config_set_vendor_id(dev->config, hdev.vendor_id);
>>>>>>>>>>> + pci_config_set_device_id(dev->config, hdev.device_id);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you, instead, implement the reverse logic, probing
>>>>>>>> the card and supplying the correct device id for PCH?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here what is your so-called reverse logic as I already asked you
>>>>>>> previously? Do you mean I should list all PCHs with a combo illustrated
>>>>>>> with the vendor/device id in advance? Then look up if we can find a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael,
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Tiejun
>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you explain this exactly? Then I can try follow-up your idea ASAP
>>>>>> if this is necessary and possible.
>>>>
>>>> Michel,
>>>>
>>>> Could you give us some explanation for your "reverse logic" when you're
>>>> free?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Tiejun
>>>
>>> So future drivers will look at device ID for the card
>>> and figure out how things should work from there.
>>> Old drivers still poke at device id of the chipset for this,
>>> but maybe qemu can do what newer drivers do:
>>> look at the card and figure out what guest should do,
>>> then present the appropriate chipset id.
>>>
>>> This is based on what Jesse said:
>>> Practically speaking, we could probably assume specific GPU/PCH combos,
>>> as I don't think they're generally mixed across generations, though SNB
>>> and IVB did have compatible sockets, so there is the possibility of
>>> mixing CPT and PPT PCHs, but those are register identical as far as the
>>> graphics driver is concerned, so even that should be safe.
>>>
>>
>> Michael,
>>
>> Thanks for your explanation.
>>
>>> so the idea is to have a reverse table mapping GPU back to PCH.
>>> Present to guest the ID that will let it assume the correct GPU.
>>
>> I guess you mean we should create to maintain such a table:
>>
>> [GPU Card: device_id(s), PCH: device_id]
>>
>> Then each time, instead of exposing that real PCH device id directly, qemu
>> first can get the real GPU device id to lookup this table to present a
>> appropriate PCH's device id to the guest.
>>
>> And looks here that appropriate PCH's device id is not always a that real
>> PCH's device id. Right? If I'm wrong please correct me.
>
> Exactly: we don't really care what the PCH ID is - we only need it
> for the guest driver to do the right thing.
Agreed.
I need to ask Allen to check if one given GPU card device id is always
corresponding to one given PCH on both HSW and BDW currently. If yes, I
can do this quickly. Otherwise I need some time to establish that sort
of connection.
Thanks
Tiejun
>
>>>
>>> the problem with these tables is they are hard to keep up to date
>>
>> Yeah. But I think currently we can just start from some modern CPU such as
>> HSW and BDW, then things could be easy.
>>
>> Allen,
>>
>> Any idea to this suggestion?
>>
>>> as new hardware comes out, but as future hardware won't need
>>> these hacks, we shall be fine.
>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tiejun
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Tiejun
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> matched PCH? If yes, what is that benefit you expect in passthrough
>>>>>>> case? Shouldn't we pass these info to VM directly in passthrough case?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Tiejun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-01 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 1:28 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] qemu:xen: implement isa bridge specific to IGD passthrough Tiejun Chen
2014-08-21 1:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw:xen:xen_pt: register " Tiejun Chen
2014-08-21 1:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen:i386:pc_piix: create " Tiejun Chen
2014-08-21 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-22 1:06 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-24 11:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-08-25 5:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-26 2:49 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-28 0:56 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-29 1:28 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-31 8:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-01 2:50 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-01 6:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-01 7:49 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-09-03 1:40 ` Kay, Allen M
2014-09-03 6:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-03 15:06 ` Kay, Allen M
2014-09-28 2:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-28 5:38 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-07 7:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-09 2:16 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-29 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-30 2:43 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-07 1:02 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-07 7:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-09 5:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-12 9:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-24 7:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 13:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-30 7:47 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 7:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 11:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-03 11:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 11:47 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 12:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-03 13:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-05 7:23 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-08-22 18:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54042514.6090206@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).