From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block: immediately cancel oversized read/write requests
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:16:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540DC849.8030203@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN05THTw=kH8czp24TVBBQXXSN8v1fuTrCogapRAdK0g-KywhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08.09.2014 17:13, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Il 08/09/2014 16:35, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>>>>> messages. :)
>>>>> So you would not throw an error msg here?
>>>> No, though a trace could be useful.
>>> Is there a howto somewhere how to implement that?
>> Try commit 4ac4458076e1aaf3b01a6361154117df20e22215.
>>
>>> Whats your opinion changed the max_xfer_len to 0xffff regardsless
>>> of use_16_for_rw in iSCSI?
>> If you implemented request splitting in the block layer, it would be
>> okay to force max_xfer_len to 0xffff.
> I think it should be OK if that is a different series. This only
> affects the iSCSI transport since it is the only transport so far to
> record or report a max transfer length.
> If a guest generates these big requests(i.e. not multiwrite) we
> already fail them due to the READ10 limitations. We would just fail
> the request at a different layer in the stack with these patches.
>
>
> What I would like to see would also be to report these limitations to
> the guest itself to prevent it from generating too large I/Os.
> I am willing to do that part once the initial max_xfer_len ones are finished.
Yes, I also think this approach is straightforward. We should avoid
big requests at the beginning and not fix them at the end.
I had a look it shouldn't be too hard. There are default values for
virtio-scsi HD inquiry emulation which are set if no cmdline values
are specified. It should be possible to feed them from bs->bl if set.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 16:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] introduce max_transfer_length Peter Lieven
2014-09-05 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] BlockLimits: " Peter Lieven
2014-09-05 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block: immediately cancel oversized read/write requests Peter Lieven
2014-09-08 13:44 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-08 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-08 13:56 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-08 13:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-08 14:35 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-08 14:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-08 14:54 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-23 8:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-23 8:55 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-23 9:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-08 15:13 ` ronnie sahlberg
2014-09-08 15:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-08 15:18 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-08 15:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-08 16:18 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-08 16:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-12 11:43 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-18 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-18 14:16 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-18 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-18 22:57 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-08 15:16 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2014-09-05 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] block/iscsi: set max_transfer_length Peter Lieven
2014-09-05 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] block: avoid creating oversized writes in multiwrite_merge Peter Lieven
2014-09-18 14:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-18 22:56 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-19 13:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 9:43 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-22 19:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-23 6:15 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-23 8:59 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-23 9:04 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-23 9:32 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-23 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-23 9:52 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-23 10:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-30 7:26 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-30 8:03 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-05 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] introduce max_transfer_length ronnie sahlberg
2014-09-05 19:52 ` Peter Lieven
2014-09-05 21:22 ` ronnie sahlberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540DC849.8030203@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).