From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFP28-0004i9-8q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:00:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFP24-0001rm-6d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:00:15 -0400 Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1466016055-31351-1-git-send-email-clord@redhat.com> <20160617095451.GC6994@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20160621093252.GF32560@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <42716482-40e8-64f3-8f57-f6bde71f4c20@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <54119adb-1ae2-b2a5-d1e4-32e967cc87a1@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:59:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <42716482-40e8-64f3-8f57-f6bde71f4c20@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Dynamic module loading for block drivers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Colin Lord , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com On 21/06/2016 17:42, Colin Lord wrote: > It could easily return the BlockDriver then > using the name field. It seems to me that this would work, and would be > a fairly minor change from how things are now (in particular I think > that symlinks wouldn't be necessary with this). Yes, I agree. paolo