From: "Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Ahmed Karaman <ahmedkhaledkaraman@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] [GSoC - TCG Continuous Benchmarking] [#2] Dissecting QEMU Into Three Main Parts
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:46:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54168dd1-2907-37ef-20d4-9feddf7c7561@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHiYmc7tYYWb6AMQeFtCOQFXWbzB4+jGx1Zia+uvDd8ej+rieg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1881 bytes --]
> However, we know that the results for hosts of different architectures
> will be different - we expect that.
>
> 32-bit Intel host will also most likely produce significantly
> different results than 64-bit Intel hosts. By the way, 64-bit targets
> in QEMU linux-user mode are not supported on 32-bit hosts (although
> nothing stops the user to start corresponding instances of QEMU on a
> 32-bit host, but the results are unpredictable.
>
> Let's focus now on Intel 64-bit hosts only. Richard, can you perhaps
> enlighten us on whether QEMU (from the point of view of TCG target)
> behaves differently on different Intel 64-bit hosts, and to what
> degree?
>
> I currently work remotely, but once I am be physically at my office I
> will have a variety of hosts at the company, and would be happy to do
> the comparison between them, wrt what you presented in Report 2.
>
> In conclusion, I think a basic description of your test bed is missing
> in your reports. And, for final reports (which we call "nightly
> reports") a detailed system description, as Mr Lukas outlined, is,
> also in my opinion, necessary.
>
> Thanks, Mr. Lukas, for bringing this to our attention!
>
You're welcome. I'm more on the python side, but as far as I know different cpu models (provided their features are enabled) and especially architectures result in way different code-paths. Imagine an old processor without vector instructions compare to newer ones that can process multiple instructions at once.
As for the reports, I don't think that at this point it would be necessary to focus on anything besides a single cpu model (x86_64 Intel) as there are already many variables. Later someone can follow-up with a cross-arch comparison, if necessary.
Regards,
Lukáš
> Yours,
> Aleksandar
>
>
>
>
>> Best regards,
>> Ahmed Karaman
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-29 10:25 [REPORT] [GSoC - TCG Continuous Benchmarking] [#2] Dissecting QEMU Into Three Main Parts Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-29 10:40 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-29 14:26 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-29 16:03 ` Alex Bennée
2020-06-29 18:21 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-29 21:16 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-01 13:44 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-01 15:42 ` Alex Bennée
2020-07-01 17:47 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-03 22:46 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-07-04 8:45 ` Alex Bennée
2020-07-04 9:19 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-07-04 9:55 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-07-04 17:10 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-30 4:33 ` Lukáš Doktor
2020-06-30 7:18 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-30 8:58 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 12:46 ` Lukáš Doktor [this message]
2020-06-30 19:14 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-30 9:41 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 12:58 ` Lukáš Doktor
2020-06-30 5:59 ` 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)
2020-06-30 7:29 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-06-30 8:21 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 9:52 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2020-06-30 19:02 ` Ahmed Karaman
2020-07-01 14:47 ` Ahmed Karaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54168dd1-2907-37ef-20d4-9feddf7c7561@redhat.com \
--to=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=ahmedkhaledkaraman@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).