From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59320)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XToqM-0007ne-Vm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:14:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XToqD-00071z-If
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:14:38 -0400
Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]:55741)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XToqD-00070Z-8r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:14:29 -0400
Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id i17so5513787qcy.17
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5417FF6D.8020009@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:14:21 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20140905135244.104423770@amt.cnet>
In-Reply-To: <20140905135244.104423770@amt.cnet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/3] kvmclock: Ensure time in migration
 never goes backward (v3)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru>, =?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2luIEdpYnXFgmE=?= <m.gibula@beyond.pl>

Il 05/09/2014 15:52, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto:
> Regression fix tested with fio and ping-pong migration.

I applied the patches, but in a different order (2-3-1) to keep them
bisectable.

Can you send a follow-up patch, adding a comment before the call to
cpu_clean_all_dirty that explains what's going on?

Paolo