From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>
Cc: Hani Benhabiles <kroosec@gmail.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, mprivozn@redhat.com,
nbd-general@lists.sf.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
nick@bytemark.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] NBD TLS support in QEMU
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 13:28:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542D36E8.2010705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141002110516.GG13032@redhat.com>
Il 02/10/2014 13:05, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:23:26PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:26:09PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> Tunneling the entire protocol inside an SSL connection doesn't fix that;
>>> if an attacker is able to hijack your TCP connections and change flags,
>>> then this attacker is also able to hijack your TCP connection and
>>> redirect it to a decrypting/encrypting proxy.
>>>
>>> I agree that preventing a possible SSL downgrade attack (and other forms
>>> of MITM) should be high on the priority list, but "tunnel the whole
>>> thing in SSL" doesn't do that.
>>
>> So, having given this some thought, I wanted to come up with a spec just
>> so that we had something we could all agree on. As part of that, I had a
>> look at qemu-nbd, and noticed that it uses the "oldstyle" handshake
>> protocol (on port 10809 by default -- ew, please don't do that).
>>
>> I had to change the protocol incompatibly a few years back, because the
>> oldstyle protocol is broken by design; in the oldstyle negotiation
>> protocol, the server dumps all information it has on the export to the
>> client, and then moves on to the data negotiation phase, without waiting
>> for any reply from the client. This means the oldstyle protocol can't be
>> used for any sort of negotiation[1].
>>
>> As such, I strongly suggest that qemu-nbd move to the newstyle protocol.
>
> Even if we added support for the newstyle protocol I don't see us being
> able to drop the oldstyle protocol. NBD is used during migration of block
> storage, and we need to be able to migrate from old QEMU to new QEMU and
> vica-verca, so can't just switch protocol in a new QEMU without retaining
> a way to use the old protocol.
For that you don't use qemu-nbd, we use the NBD server that is embedded
in the QEMU executable. That one shares almost all the code with
qemu-nbd but, because we are exporting multiple disks over a single
port, ends up using the new-style protocol.
qemu-nbd uses the old-style protocol only because it has a single,
unnamed export.
QEMU's NBD client will use the old-style protocol if given URLs like
nbd://HOST:PORT/, and the new-style protocol for nbd://HOST:PORT/NAME.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 16:44 [Qemu-devel] NBD TLS support in QEMU Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-04 14:19 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-04 14:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Daniel P. Berrange
2014-09-04 15:04 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-04 15:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-04 15:54 ` John Snow
2014-09-04 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-04 22:54 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-05 8:42 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-05 12:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-04 22:02 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-05 8:13 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-09-05 8:34 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-05 12:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-05 6:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Michal Privoznik
2014-09-05 8:10 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-09-05 8:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hani Benhabiles
2014-09-05 12:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-05 13:26 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-01 20:23 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-02 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-02 13:50 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-08 18:16 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-09 12:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-02 11:05 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-02 11:28 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-10-17 22:03 ` [Qemu-devel] spec, RFC: TLS support for NBD Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-18 6:33 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-10-20 7:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-20 9:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-10-20 11:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-10-20 11:56 ` Florian Weimer
2014-10-20 12:48 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-10-20 22:10 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-21 9:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-21 18:02 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-20 12:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-20 21:53 ` [Qemu-devel] spec, RFC: TLS support for NBDµ Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-21 8:17 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-10-21 18:30 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-25 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-30 10:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-10-31 18:15 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-11-03 14:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542D36E8.2010705@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kroosec@gmail.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mprivozn@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd-general@lists.sf.net \
--cc=nick@bytemark.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=w@uter.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).