From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa36g-0000tn-DE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:41:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa36X-0007Yg-BI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:41:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]:52393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa36X-0007Yb-6A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:41:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id h18so2283781igc.0 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <542EA76B.8000102@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:40:59 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <542D6D57.7060702@liquidweb.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] is x-data-plane considered "stable" ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexandre DERUMIER , Scott Sullivan Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 03/10/2014 12:11, Alexandre DERUMIER ha scritto: > I don't now about the stability, but here what is working and I have tested: > > -live migration > -resizing > -io throttling > -hotplugging > > I think block jobs (mirror,backup,...) don't work yet. > > > it's working with virtio-blk and virtio-scsi support is coming for qemu 2.2 virtio-scsi support will _not_ be stable in 2.2. It will only be there for developers, basically. Paolo