From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa3Cu-0002Hx-DI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:47:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa3Co-0001wI-9V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:47:40 -0400 Received: from email.liquidweb.com ([67.227.164.41]:39367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa3Co-0001w6-4m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:47:34 -0400 Message-ID: <542EA8F4.5040106@liquidweb.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:47:32 -0400 From: Scott Sullivan MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <542D6D57.7060702@liquidweb.com> <542EA76B.8000102@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <542EA76B.8000102@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] is x-data-plane considered "stable" ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Alexandre DERUMIER Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/03/2014 09:40 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 03/10/2014 12:11, Alexandre DERUMIER ha scritto: >> I don't now about the stability, but here what is working and I have tested: >> >> -live migration >> -resizing >> -io throttling >> -hotplugging >> >> I think block jobs (mirror,backup,...) don't work yet. >> >> >> it's working with virtio-blk and virtio-scsi support is coming for qemu 2.2 > virtio-scsi support will _not_ be stable in 2.2. It will only be there > for developers, basically. > > Paolo Thank you everyone, appreciated.