From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa4r6-0002JT-Nr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:33:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa4qy-0008Be-Vc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:33:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa4qy-0008B5-P6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 11:33:08 -0400 Message-ID: <542EC1AC.8010606@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 17:33:00 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] is x-data-plane considered "stable" ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexandre DERUMIER Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Scott Sullivan Il 03/10/2014 16:26, Alexandre DERUMIER ha scritto: > Hi Paolo, > > do you you think it'll be possible to use block jobs with dataplane ? > > Or is it technically impossible ? I think Stefan has posted patches for that or is going to do that very soon. The goal is to let dataplane do everything that is possible without it, at the same speed of QEMU 2.0 dataplane (right now it's a bit slower, but can already do much more of course). Same for virtio-scsi. Paolo