From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XefiS-000426-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:43:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XefiN-0004ED-BY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:43:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XefiN-0004E5-4I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:43:15 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9G7hEQm024307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:43:14 -0400 Message-ID: <543F770F.1040503@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:43:11 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1413359145-24627-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20141015151900.65180fb9@igors-macbook-pro.local> In-Reply-To: <20141015151900.65180fb9@igors-macbook-pro.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-i386: move generic memory hotplug methods to DSDTs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com Il 15/10/2014 15:19, Igor Mammedov ha scritto: > however I'm not sure that SSDT byte-for-byte compatible will make > things better. > Since SSDT includes snippets of AML compiled by IASL, hex-templates > could be different depending on IASL version. SSDT is simple enough that there shouldn't be differences. If this were a problem, we could unconditionally use .hex.generated files or move the generation entirely to C, similar to what we do for bridges and what SeaBIOS used to do. Paolo > Ultimately > that would make us to keep versioned by machine type binary templates > so that we could guaranty byte-to-byte identity. > > Perhaps we should reconsider and think one more time about > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-stable/2014-07/msg00205.html > > which solves migration size issue and doesn't tie us to maintanance > nightmare with versioned tables. I'd preffer to keep tables > un-versioned as long as possible.