From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgHqn-0002vb-0C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:38:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgHqg-0008Bd-5l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:38:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]:55502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgHqf-0008BY-UF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:38:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id em10so7961583wid.16 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <544556A1.3020405@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:38:25 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1413796790-30579-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <20141020141548.GA11062@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20141020141548.GA11062@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Default to --no-git-fallback List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Peter Maydell Cc: Markus Armbruster , QEMU Developers On 10/20/2014 04:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > What do you want to happen in this case? > Won't this cause even more patches to fall to the floor? > > The benefit seems marginal, the risk high. I agree with Michael. Can we detect if get_maintainer.pl is invoked as a cccmd, and in this case default to --no-git-fallback? If it is invoked manually, I would like to show the committers (I will then cherry pick the right ones). Paolo