Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] microblaze: About running upstream main branch qemu

[Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>]

On 10/21/14 12:37, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 08:23 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 10/19/2014 10:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> This doesn't use devicetree, but the configurations are known to be working
>>> with kernel releases all the way back to kernel version 3.10.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, really it is !
>>
>> After try upstream qemu and upstream kernel, for me, neither them can
>> work well. For xilinx qemu with xilinux kernel, it should be well,
>> although I still met issue below, is what I have done incorrect?
>>
> 
> Difficult to say.
> 
> I use gcc 4.8.0 from kernel.org and qemu 2.1.2 with its default configuration
> for the microblaze big endian target. No idea if that makes a difference,
> but I would suggest to start with those.
> 
> For microblazeel I use gcc 4.9.1 built with buildroot 2014.08 for both
> kernel and initramfs. Initramfs for that target is built from busybox.
> 

OK, thank you very much for your information.

But sorry, I have to stop trying, because that is far from upstream qemu
and upstream kernel (at present, I have no enough time resource on it).

My original goal is "use upstream microblaze qemu to test upstream gcc,
binutils and glibc of microblaze". And now I find another ways: "use sim
which is in upstream binutils to perform the related test".


And welcome any new ideas, suggestions, and completions.

Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed