From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgZfU-00066Y-Jc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:40:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgZfO-0006dH-Vr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:40:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgZfO-0006ZB-O5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:40:02 -0400 Message-ID: <54466226.1040809@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:39:50 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1413796790-30579-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <20141020141548.GA11062@redhat.com> <544556A1.3020405@redhat.com> <87r3y1tukp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87r3y1tukp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Default to --no-git-fallback List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On 10/21/2014 03:34 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > >> On 10/20/2014 04:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> What do you want to happen in this case? >>> Won't this cause even more patches to fall to the floor? >>> >>> The benefit seems marginal, the risk high. >> >> I agree with Michael. >> >> Can we detect if get_maintainer.pl is invoked as a cccmd, and in this >> case default to --no-git-fallback? If it is invoked manually, I would >> like to show the committers (I will then cherry pick the right ones). > > I don't like context-sensitive defaults. Too much magic. > > What about this: if get_maintainer.pl comes up empty, it points you to > --git-fallback. Sounds fair enough! Paolo